Phishing Simulation and Training
Phishing is still the easiest way into most organizations, which is exactly why generic "click here if this looks suspicious" training doesn't move the needle much. People need to practice against lures that actually resemble what's landing in their inbox — not an obviously fake prize notification, but something that looks like a vendor invoice, a calendar invite, or a message from IT.
I build simulations around your real environment: the tools you use, the vendors you work with, the way your own internal emails are actually written. That's what makes a simulation useful instead of theater. A campaign that's too easy to spot teaches nothing; one built from real reconnaissance teaches people what to actually watch for.
What I measure, and why
Click rate alone is a weak signal — it tells you who clicked, not what happened next. I look at reporting rate (did anyone flag it to security), time-to-report, and whether a credential or payload was actually submitted. Those numbers tell a very different story than a single click-through percentage, and they're what actually tells you whether your program is working.
Training that follows, not lectures
The moment right after someone clicks a simulated phish is the best teaching moment you'll get — short, specific, non-punitive feedback tied to exactly what they just experienced. I'd rather build that into the program than run a once-a-year compliance video nobody remembers by February.
If your last phishing test was a canned tool with a generic template, it's worth running one properly scoped and realistic to see what you're actually dealing with. Let's set one up.